log in  |  register  |  feedback?  |  help  |  web accessibility
Logo
Speculative Analysis: What's Wrong with the Program I Haven't Written Yet?
Monday, March 12, 2012, 11:00 am-12:00 pm Calendar
  • You are subscribed to this talk through .
  • You are watching this talk through .
  • You are subscribed to this talk. (unsubscribe, watch)
  • You are watching this talk. (unwatch, subscribe)
  • You are not subscribed to this talk. (watch, subscribe)
Abstract

 

Software developers primarily rely on experience and intuition to make development decisions.  I will describe speculative analysis, a new technique that helps developers make better decisions by informing them of the consequences of their likely actions.
 
As a concrete example, I will consider collaborative development and the conflicts that arise when developers make changes in parallel. This is a serious problem.  In industry, some companies hire
developers solely to resolve conflicts.  In open-source development, my historical analysis of over 140,000 versions of nine systems revealed that textual, compilation, and behavioral conflicts are
frequent and persistent, posing a significant challenge to collaborative development.  Speculative analysis can help solve this problem by informing developers early about potential and existing
conflicts.  Armed with this information, developers can prevent or more easily resolve the conflicts.  I will demonstrate Crystal, a publicly available tool that detects such conflicts early and
precisely.  Crystal has inspired a collaboration with Microsoft and some Microsoft teams now use a version of the tool in their everyday work.
 
My research focuses on helping developers understand system behavior. By informing developers of the consequences of their choices, speculative analysis allows developers to understand the choices’
implications on the system’s behavior, leading to better decisions and higher-quality software.  I will briefly describe three other results that help developers understand system behavior and then summarize my vision of how the mechanisms that inform developers can also be used
to inform the system itself, allowing for self-adapting and self-managing systems.
Bio

 

Yuriy Brun is an NSF CRA CI Fellow at the University of Washington.  He received his Ph.D. degree in 2008 from the University of Southern California, as an Andrew Viterbi Fellow, and his M.Eng. degree in 2003 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  His doctoral research was a finalist in the ACM Doctoral Dissertation Competition in 2008. His most recent work on speculative analysis, the subject of his talk, won a 2011 ACM SIGSOFT Distinguished Paper Award.
 
Yuriy’s research interests are in software system modeling, design, and development, focusing on understanding how local component behavior affects global system behavior.  His goals are to make it
easier for developers to (1) understand their systems' behavior and (2) create systems with desired behavior.
This talk is organized by Jeff Foster